|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Tiberius Zol
turaagaq
GANOR INC.
40
   |
Posted - 2014.11.25 16:58:11 -
[1] - Quote
What a wonderfull pre christmas gift.
Thank you Sir o7
Ps: all you guys, unsubbing your isboxer accounts: just send me a nice little contract with your stuff. i will use it wise. :) |
Tiberius Zol
turaagaq
GANOR INC.
41
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 17:09:08 -
[2] - Quote
Longtooth wrote:confirming 7 accounts not being resubbed. Time to find a game with Devs who are a bit more level headed. Thanks for 8 years of wasting time. o7
and
Recyclers wrote:
Well I just unsubed all 9 of my accounts. Not just because of the multiboxing thing.
CPP ramming way to many changes at once.
I play games if there fun. When there not.... oh well
Your're welcome. Hope you enjoyed it.
Just send me a nice little contract with your stuff. I will take care of it. |
Tiberius Zol
turaagaq
GANOR INC.
41
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 11:20:40 -
[3] - Quote
The rule should be: one keystroke should result in exact one action and this action should be limited to exact one client.. no round robin, no broadcast no other shenanigan..
In my opinion, this is what CCP tries to define with this change. |
Tiberius Zol
turaagaq
GANOR INC.
44
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 12:10:13 -
[4] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:That is the new rule. Round robin only sends one keypress to one client. Round robin is basically a key which rebinds itself to a new client when pressed
For example if I set up a round robin keybind for F1 on 4 clients, then press F1, it does this for each press:
Press 1 - F1 on Client 1
Press 2 - F1 on Client 2
Press 3 - F1 on Client 3
Press 4 - F1 on Client 4
Press 5 - F1 on Client 1
Press 6 - F1 on Client 2
Each key press only executes one command on one client, but I don't need to alt tab, I simply hit the F1 key multiple times while looking at the screen I'm controlling them from.
As i read in this thread before, you can use round robin to nearly automat input (ex: with programmed timers). In my opinion there shouldn't be any function allowed, that changes bindings on the fly after you set up a bunch of rules or any other stuff like you described above. |
Tiberius Zol
turaagaq
GANOR INC.
55
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 09:01:02 -
[5] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Wrong, actually. A better tl;dr would be: People want CCP to stop killing emergent gameplay simply because a select few individuals cried about it long enough. Especially since this program does not violate any part of 6A2 and input broadcasting is nowhere to be found in the EULA. CCP might as well remove fleets and declare that you can't fly with your friends..
The only "minority" crying for about 200 pages, are you few guys who desperately search for workarounds to use your tools.
You want CCP to justify their bans? They don't have to.
You want to dictate CCP how they have to work? Good luck.
You say, you pay for it? No one soerce you to do. Just leave the game.
Maybe it is not obvious to you few guys, but CCP can ban whoever they want without a reason.
And using tools like you do is a good reason. You didn't get banned yet? Lucky guys. But this doesn't mean you're right and CCP wrong.
Mr. Tibbers on twitter: @Mr_Tibbers
Mr. Tibbers Blog (german, but english posts incoming): www.eve-versum.de
|
|
|
| |
|